Draft template for team review — sample structure only. The card fields and filters below are proposals; tell me what to keep, cut, or add.
The CFAR Landscape
See what each CFAR is doing, and filter by research area, population, training, location, and inter-CFAR collaboration.
CFARs across the United States
Select a marker or use the region list to explore a CFAR.
Geography at a glance
Click a region to filter the map and list.For your review
Draft note — will be removed before launchThis is a working template so we can agree what belongs on each CFAR "card" versus in the filters.
Proposed on the card
- CFAR name
- Developmental (D-CFAR) flag — shown only on D-CFARs (most centers are full CFARs, so we mark the exceptions)
- Region
- Center description
- Website and Newsletter links
Proposed in the filters
- Region · Developmental (D-CFAR) filter
- Research area (in place of EHE, which is Missouri-specific)
- Population
- Training program
- Core (shared cores + specialty cores)
- Location (incl. global countries)
- Inter-CFAR working group
- Scientific working group (each CFAR's own)
Open questions for the group
- Anything else that must be on the card (lead PI? institution? est. year)?
- Keep Cores and Working Groups as filters, or too granular?
- Right list of research areas?
- How to frame Populations?
- Locations: countries only, or regions too?
- Should we show which WGs a CFAR leads vs. joins?
- Scientific working groups are now a filter — does this vocabulary look right, and is it distinct enough from Research area?
- NIH funding institutes: context only (as below), or a per-CFAR filter for primary emphasis?